The Boston Rescuer
Online Edition

". . . knowing that in the Lord your labor is not in vain." — 1 Cor. 15:58

 

 

Home page

Regular events

Other news & reference

Operation Rescue: Boston -- Our mission

Buffer zone status and analysis

Excommunication of "Catholic" politicians

Abortion-related violence

 

Abortion clinic whistleblowers: click here: clinicworker.com

Interesting links

 

AARP and Catholics:  Serious Differences

by Robert W. Bleakney, Ph.D 

The American Association of Retired Persons offers numerous benefits to its potential members, but these do not begin to compare with the benefits that come to me as a member of the Catholic Church, and so I have no interest in joining the AARP, since serious differences exist between the teachings of the AARP versus those of the Vatican.  These include conflicting positions with regard to abortion, euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research, and same-sex marriage. 

The Catholic Church’s teaching concerning abortion, euthanasia, care for human embryos, and marriage can be found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (available online at http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc.htm), and so here my focus will be on the teachings of the AARP, which are not so well known. 

Abortion and euthanasia

The AARP’s Web site includes an article on Planned Parenthood that commends perhaps the largest abortion corporation in the world for  providing “abortion services,” “family planning services,” “reproductive health care,” and “reproductive health services” (http://healthtools.aarp.org/galecontent/planned-parenthood).  But how could anyone could speak of killing an unborn child as an act of service or care?

A similar question arises with regard to mercy-killing or euthanasia, which for the AARP can be a form of “palliative care.”  In The AARP Policy Book, the organization thus claims, "States should legally recognize physicians' duty to provide palliative care sufficient to relieve patients' pain, limited only by patients' informed wishes and the limits of medical science" (7-101). 

So strongly is the AARP committed to a right of assisted suicide for patients experiencing pain that it rejects a right of conscience should a healthcare professional understand a vocation of healing the sick to exclude one of killing the sick.  In Idaho, AARP was vocal in its opposition to Senate Bill No. 1353 (https://votesmart.org/billtext/29171.pdf) that would (as summarized by Life News) “make it so pro-life health care workers don't have to fear for their jobs if they decide they don't want to dispense drugs that could be used to cause abortions or kill patients at the end of their life.”  The bill didn’t outlaw either abortions or any other action resulting in an end to a patient’s life, but rather required that employers must provide reasonable accommodation to any employees who provided advance written notification of any conscientious objections to such that they might have.  For the AARP’s Idaho lobbyist David Irwin, this evidently was too much, as he complained, “The deathbed is the wrong place to learn someone else’s conscience.” (http://www.lifenews.com/state4908.html)   

AARP has also endorsed Obamacare, aka the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/aarp-endorses-affordable-health-care-for-america-act-69288467.html), notwithstanding objections to this bill from pro-life advocates.   Attorneys for the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) have prepared an affidavit arguing in detail that “abortion coverage is authorized” by this bill through “four specific programs” (http://www.nrlc.org/AHC/DvSBA/Release101210.htm).  In addition, the NRLC has warned that, as a result of Obamacare, patients could feel pressured or persuaded to revoking life-saving medical treatment or food and water, since (in the words of LifeNews), “Section 1233 of the bill would pay physicians to give Medicare patients end-of-life counseling every five years or sooner if the patient has a terminal diagnosis.”  (http://www.lifenews.com/bio2926.html, http://www.lifenews.com/bio2992.html).   

Embryonic stem cell research

Consistent with its endorsement of Planned Parenthood’s “abortion services,” The AARP Policy Book (page 7-105) endorses stem cell research without making any exceptions for research on a human embryo or fetus: 

Policymakers should provide…adequate support for basic science, stem cell, and genetic research, both to advance research into preventing and treating serious diseases and conditions affecting people of all ages and to ensure that the US remains at the forefront of biomedical research and development.

Advocates on both sides of the debate concerning such research have understood the AARP’s endorsement as intended to include experimentation on human embryos.  Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office thus listed the AARP among other organizations that supported embryonic stem cell research (http://www.speaker.gov/legislation?id=0006), and

Life Decisions International has advocated a boycott of AARP, saying that it supports embryonic stem cell research. 

Same-sex marriage

For the Catholic Church, marriage between a man and a woman is understood to be utterly unique in the order of creation, and thus incapable of equation with any other form of relationship.  At the same time, the universal dignity of all people as made in the divine image provides a foundation in Catholic teaching for treating all people with respect for their sacred worth. 

The AARP does not regard marriage as uniquely between a man and a woman, but instead joins lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered activists in advocacy for their causes, including when it comes to marriage.  The AARP thus sponsored the formation of a gay rights group for seniors called Senior Action in a Gay Environment (SAGE) (  

For both Catholic individuals and groups, the imperative of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops should be seen as just as applicable to the AARP as it would be to Planned Parenthood, whose “abortion services” the AARP commends:  "The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions" (http://www.nccbuscc.org/bishops/catholicsinpoliticallife.shtml). 

Given the opposition of the AARP to Catholic social teachings concerning human life and marriage, Catholic individuals and groups should not extend even the smallest amount of material cooperation to the AARP, lest they become an accessory to the AARP’s actions or suggest support for them.  ##


 

  Operation Rescue: Boston    P.O. Box 870037    Milton Village, MA 02187-0037
William Cotter, President
  
E-mail the Boston Rescuer              

nbsp; Still, no one should be under any illusion as to whether or not the AARP’s teachings might be even close to compatible with those of the Catholic Church regarding the sanctity of life and marriage.

Nor am I proposing that Catholic dioceses and parishes withdraw from participation in the general society, including on issues of particular concern to retired persons.  After all, alternatives to the AARP exist, including the American Seniors Association, Generation America, the 60 Plus Association, the Conservative 50 Plus Alliance, and the Association of Mature American Citizens.  None of these groups advocates any position on its Web site contrary to the sanctity of life or marriage; indeed, the Conservative 50 Plus Alliance emphasizes the following theme for its advocacy:  “Protect the sanctity of human life including [through] health care reform free of any tax-funded abortion.” (http://conservative50plus.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=48&Itemid=41#cont)   Moreover, many other groups exist that provide an opportunity for Catholics to participate in the wider society, including some like Catholics for the Common Good, Catholic Charities, and numerous pro-life groups that are fully consistent with a Catholic social witness, even if their agenda is not related especially to seniors.   

For both Catholic individuals and groups, the imperative of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops should be seen as just as applicable to the AARP as it would be to Planned Parenthood, whose “abortion services” the AARP commends:  "The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions" (http://www.nccbuscc.org/bishops/catholicsinpoliticallife.shtml). 

Given the opposition of the AARP to Catholic social teachings concerning human life and marriage, Catholic individuals and groups should not extend even the smallest amount of material cooperation to the AARP, lest they become an accessory to the AARP’s actions or suggest support for them.  ##


 

  Operation Rescue: Boston    P.O. Box 870037    Milton Village, MA 02187-0037
William Cotter, President
  
E-mail the Boston Rescuer